Hanging On To A Lead-In Audience Print E-mail

Hanging On To A Lead-In Audience
by Graeme Newell
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://www.602communications.com
Twitter: gnewell
Facebook: facebook.com/gnewell

The promo slots at the end of primetime are unquestionably some of the most important moments of the entire news day.  The viewer is just minutes away from the newscast.  If you can get this huge audience to hang around just a few more minutes they can exponentially increase your news numbers.

Unfortunately, the network does not make it easy to hold this audience through this break from hell.  Although it varies from network to network, the general structure looks like this:

1)  End of network prime show
2)  "Stay tuned for scenes from next week's show"
3)  Local Station end-of-prime tease
4)  Commercials
5)  Next week's show preview
6)  Commercials
7)  Network Promos
8)  Credit Squeezed Network Promos
9)  Local Station Credit Squeeze Tease
10) Local Break (optional)
11) Start of the newscast

For local newscasts the best opportunities come with item three and item nine.  It is important to realized that these two teases serve very different purposes.

The local station end-of-prime tease is for viewers who just watched the prime show.  It comes seconds after the network show ends and is one your best shots to hold an audience.  The goal here is to showcase all the very best sound and video in your entire cast.  This one tease should contain the most magical moments of your entire show.

Most stations fall far short of the goal.  Typically, this tease contains a talking-head anchor describing the news, instead of showing me the great stuff that's coming up.  The tacit message here - "I really couldn't be bothered to actually show you video or sound from the best stories in my newscast, so you'll just have to trust me...it's great."

Some of the time, the problem is "video hoarding." Producers hold back their best sound and video.  They don’t want to "give it away" in the open.  Reinforce with your team that great video belongs in BOTH the open and the story.  It is perfectly okay to use these precious resources multiple times.

In the bustle of producing a show, this all-important open tease is often an afterthought rather than a priority. It simply tells the news rather than enticing viewers into the show.  This tease hangs on to prime viewers. Doing a good job on this tease will drastically improve your news numbers.  If you must neglect something, choose any other part of the show.  Better to neglect something later in your show than to neglect this critical tune-out point.  Every component in this segment should have incredible power and a focus that holds on to viewers.  Craft the pre-show with the same attention to detail used in the top story.  It's that important.

So judge your end of prime tease by the amount of talking head and VO.  The goal - all fantastic sound and video that defies even the sleepiest viewer to turn away.  No talking heads.

Graeme Newell is a broadcast and new media marketer who specializes in core emotional drivers.  He guarantees that his teasing seminar will immediately increase your news ratings or his workshop is free.  Find out more here.
 
Research Questions for Meaningful Change Print E-mail
Research Questions for Meaningful Change
by Graeme Newell
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://www.602communications.com
Twitter: gnewell
Facebook: facebook.com/gnewell

You'll probably spend a boatload of money on that next research survey, but are you getting data that will truly motivate change within your organization?  Are you getting the standard template questions used by every station in the country, or something customized to your organization?  When designing a survey, it is important that you roll up your sleeves, jettison the perennial survey gems, and craft questions your team will actually use.  This means working backwards from the frontline solution, not working forward from the questions.

Baseline audience information is important to assess, but far too many surveys provide little else.  This is especially prevalent with tracking surveys.  We ask the same general questions year after year, in hope of tracking improvement.  Sure, this information is nice to know, but does it lead to real change within your organization?

There should be few questions on your survey that do not lead to a corresponding and immediate action by your staff.  For example, if I ask my wife "Do you think I am a good husband?" there is little I can do with the information in her answer.  I will get a general impression, but I cannot take any action with this information.  But if I ask my wife "What specific things could I do around the house that would make you feel better about our relationship?" now I have information I can act upon.

So the question "What shows on our channel are appointment viewing?" is a good one.  That's because it would answer the question "Which of our shows should go to the top of our promotion list and have the greatest chance of creating a viewing habit?"  It would lead to an immediate restructuring of your on-air scheduling strategy.

Make your research company start the process from scratch - no templates.  Begin the questionnaire process with a careful assessment by your managers and frontline supervisors.  What answers about the audience will empower them to take a specific and decisive action?  Try to reduce questions that provide general audience impressions.  Look for information that will empower them to move forward with a resolute step.

Ask the team "What are the most important things you would like to know about our audience?"  However, this question must be followed up with "What immediate action would you take if you had an answer to that question?"  If they cannot give you an answer to that second part, then it should not be on the survey.

So here is the structure of the staff's answer:
"If I knew this, I would take this immediate action."

Examples;
Graphics: "If I knew the audience's taste for adventure and excitement, I would immediately adjust the speed and clutter factor in our on-air look."
Producers: "If I knew how the audience felt about scenes of violence, I would adjust the amount of graphic violence in my shows."
Editors: "If I knew the audience's level of fascination with big name stars, I would immediately adjust who and what is featured in my in-show teases."
Marketing: "If I knew whether our audience sees itself as more tough or more smart, I would adjust the style of humor used in our image marketing."

So put your own research to the test.  Whip out your last questionnaire and give each question the actionable test.  Are there a lot of questions that inform, but are not actionable?  How many of those questions led to a specific reaction within your organization?

Graeme Newell is a broadcast and new media marketer who specializes in core emotional drivers.  He guarantees that his teasing seminar will immediately increase your news ratings or his workshop is free.  Find out more here.
 
Using Fear to Motivate News Viewing Print E-mail

Using Fear to Motivate News Viewing

by Graeme Newell
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://www.602communications.com
Twitter: gnewell
Facebook: facebook.com/gnewell

Fear. It is the number one emotional sell of television news promos. During rating periods, the pressure to deliver an audience becomes even more acute and "watch or die" promos are showcased in some of the best time slots on the schedule. It is the fallback sell position for most investigative and consumer promos. The station decries a public danger then leaps tall buildings in a single bound to bring the perpetrators to justice. But does fear promotion really work? Does fear motivate viewing?

The cigarette industry has been doing "quit or die" commercials for decades. But recent research shows that aversion selling is not as effective as other less threatening advertising techniques. The study found that threatening messages are often too scary, and the audience just shuts down and blocks out the message altogether. The trick is figuring out when you've gone too far.

 Throat Cancer Ad

Australian Anti-Smoking Ad

I have been unable to find specific studies on TV news audiences and fear, but have been able to deduce some interesting trends by simply looking at how the advertising industry uses this powerful emotion. One thing for sure, this kind of sell now is often the brunt of jokes in the industry. Shows like "The Daily Show" regularly skewer this genre creating big yucks for the audience. Savvy audiences have learned to simply ignore the "watch or die" promos that pervade the airwaves.

 Gravity Kills Ad

If you do a careful analysis of fear in advertising, you'll find that cable and Madison Avenue use fear very differently than local TV news. Their approach is much more strategic. The main purpose of fear is to get your attention. There are few more powerful attention grabbers. This happens because it has been hardwired into our brains since the beginning. When we feel impending danger, we naturally sit up and pay very close attention. When that lion came around on the African savannah, perking up and paying attention meant you might escape being this afternoon's snack. This makes fear a primal shortcut for cutting through the clutter of television advertising.

The real skill in using fear comes AFTER you've gotten the audience's attention. A good dose of fright gets them watching, but you can't stop there. Skilled Madison Avenue practitioners will make a critical mood shift, moving on to other emotions to close the sale. A lot of TV news promos just continue to frighten the daylights out of their customers and never make this critical shift. We put the fear blowtorch to their emotions and burn them to ashes.

 Health Benefits Ad

These type of promos go from zero to terrified in about three seconds and never let up. What is missing is the critical handoff that will provide learning and understanding. Generally, you don't need to use the entire promo to scare people - it is overkill and can shut viewers down. Fear can be used quickly, then you can move on to the next steps.

So what should you do? Take a look at these examples and notice the sophisticated ways they bring about resolution, reassurance, and fun.

-Go for happily ever after.

Use fear to point out the danger, but make the shift to reassurance. Sure, it's dangerous out there, but if you use this product or watch this news report, everything is going to be just fine.

 Office Fire Ad

-Make a clear and obvious shift to a positive tone

Far too many stations spend the whole spot scaring the pants off the viewer, then put an inconsequential one-line resolution at the end.

 Internet Theft Ad

Spend at least half the promo telling your audience that everything will be okay. Watch how they keep the same scary music and ominous tone throughout this promo. They never let up.

 Home Sickness Ad

-Transition the music from scary to soothing. Change the VO from terrifying to tranquil.

 AOL High Speed Internet

-Empower the audience to strike back

Be a vigilante. Give them a scare off the top, then empower them to kick ass and raise hell.

 Color of Fear Ad

-Leave them with a giggle.

Scare them off the top, but then make everything okay by ending with comedy. You can use fear to get their attention, but leave them with a good warm feeling about your product and the ways it can improve life.

 I Love You Virus Ad

-Take the fear to an absurd conclusion

Watch how these spots get your attention with fear, then take the fear so far that they turn it into a joke. They make the scary point but leave you with a fun feeling.

 Poltergeist Furniture

Glad Trash Bag Meteor Shower

-Make it a scary movie kind of fright

Nothing is quite as fun as a good old fashioned horror movie.

 Surprise Ad

That same fear can be harnessed to have a fun scare reminiscent of a childhood matinee.

Lost Promo

Vampire Bats Promo

Remember that fear is a powerful tool if used wisely. Crank up the angst at the top of your commercial, but make sure you transition to a resolving emotion that leaves the audience with more than just a feeling of apprehension.

Graeme Newell is a broadcast and new media marketer who specializes in core emotional drivers.  He guarantees that his teasing seminar will immediately increase your news ratings or his workshop is free.  Find out more here.

 

 

 

 
The Dangers of Building Brands on Oversimplistic Research Print E-mail

The Dangers of Building Brands on Oversimplistic Research

by Graeme Newell
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://www.602communications.com
Twitter: gnewell
Facebook: facebook.com/gnewell

Turn on early morning television these days and you will find a zillion lawyer ads. Almost all follow the hackneyed lawyer ad script just like this ad, "Trust us. We will fight for your rights." But this morning I saw one that impressed me. Take a look at this ad.  Sure, the production values stink but the message is custom-designed to resonate with the customer. "When you sue the hospital, it isn't just a grab for cash.  You're saving children."

By focusing on the idea of "litigation as public good," he brings a sense of nobility and trust.  Potential clients looking for an attorney will probably have a lot of trust issues.  He sends the message "you can trust me" without ever using those words.  He proves trust by deed, not by endlessly repeating the phrase "trust me."

Like most advertisers, lawyers have done their research, and they know the hot-button words and phrases that resonate with their customers:  Trust us. Insurance companies will victimize you. Don't be a chump.  But every lawyer has the same research, and most of them foolishly choose the parrot approach to brand implementation. They simply spit back the exact same words that show up in everyone's research.  Everyone looks the same.  This ubiquity creates a brand message that sells the category, not the individual business.  The takeaway becomes, "you should get a lawyer," not, "you should choose me over all the other lawyers."

The same is true for a lot of television marketing.  For the most part, we all have the same quantitative research studies. "What are you looking for in a weathercast?"  "Accuracy, trust, reliability, technology, power."  Just like the lawyer ads, selling these price-of-entry attributes brands you as just another nameless face in the herd.  Just take a look at this example and you'll see a branding uniformity that is poisoning TV marketing.

I do a lot of research work with cable companies and Fortune 1000 types.  Most of them have a finely honed one-two punch of quantitative research followed by qualitative research.  Quantitative research can do a fine job finding out how customers feel about your product,  but it usually does a lousy job of finding out how your brand fits into their life and their own personal identity.  The truth is that most people don't really know how they feel about the weather.  Sure, they will spit the buzz words back at you when you ask them naively simple questions like "is severe weather coverage important to you?"  What do you think they're going to say?  Our feelings about weather are all jumbled up inside of us, mixed in with feelings of family responsibility, annoyance, safety, fashion, fun and worry.

There is a saying in the research business that if you want to find out how someone really feels about something, one of the worst things you can do is ask them. Television has a love affair with quantitative research. It is what we know. We have done it for years and we are very comfortable with it. Quantitative research is important, but it has limited ability to help you navigate the tenuous world of feelings that surround brands.  When there isn't much difference between your product and your competitor's product, that is when qualitative research becomes a necessity.

How did Dove get from something as sterile as soap and cleansing to this ad about the hope and pain of adolescent love?  It was smart enough to know that a quantitative study that asked women about their soap needs would not cut it.

Take a look at this ad for Allan Gray, a South African investment firm.  How did they get from the dry topic of cash flow and quarterly dividends to James Dean?  Good qualitative research.  Do a quantitative study where you ask an investor what he wants in a counselor and you'll get the standard list: trust, smarts, customer service, etc.  By doing a qualitative study, this company uncovered his deepest held hopes and dreams.  Take a look at its web site and you'll see the same adventurer archetype featured prominently.  This is not how he feels about stocks.  This who he dreams he'll be.

So take a look at your own marketing.  Are you parroting back quantitative research buzzwords while showing endless vanity images of your own product?  When was the last time your customers were featured prominently in your marketing?

Graeme Newell is a broadcast and new media marketer who specializes in core emotional drivers.  He guarantees that his teasing seminar will immediately increase your news ratings or his workshop is free.  Find out more here.